Creationists say the darndest things!

I've been keeping a list of "interesting" claims made by religious creationists on social media. Here are some more recent ones:

-Science is wrong because it doesn't agree with the biblical account of creation, but science is also right because it miraculously agrees with the biblical account
-All ancient human fossils are just malformed Homo Sapiens fossils
-Lucy was a bonobo
-Anthropologists conspire against the public by hiding anomalous fossils like giants
-Stone tools, like the Acheulean tear-shaped axes, could be made with a single rock chip
-It is not enough that millions of primitive stone tools have been found on the continents, there should be billions of them
-If humans have evolved, all our ancestor species should still be alive today

-The talking snake in Genesis was real, because parrots can also talk. The tree of knowledge and the tree of life are extinct plant species
-The Stone Age never happened (so who buried the millions of stone tools in the caves)?
-In the past, different human species sometimes lived at the same time, so humanity did not evolve
-A fossil of a fish with feet is not evidence that fish evolved feet and that life moved from water to land. Similarly, a dinosaur with feathered wings is not proof that birds evolved from dinosaurs
-If evolution took place, there should be billions of transitional fossils, but _none_ have been found
-To prove that a fossil is a transitional fossil, you need DNA from the extinct species
-There are no transitional fossils (when you see a listing of such fossils, the reaction is "nuh-huh", or "WHY ARE THERE NOT MORE?!?")
-For evolution to be real, we would have to see "macro" evolution (new species and organs) happening right before our eyes. God is real, even if no one has seen him create anything, however
-If evolution were real, we would have to see "half-formed" animals in the world - why aren't modern animals "transitioning"?!
-Lungs could not have evolved from gills because the "transitioning animals" would have died on land within 10 minutes
-Stalagmites form just as quickly under natural conditions as in caves visited by humans and around man-made metal rails - disproving millions of years
-All bacteria belong to one species
-All vestigial structures have been "debunked" (Where and by whom? No one knows)
-DNA is information, but when scientists observe duplication mutations that form more DNA, this does not lead to more information: 1 plus 1 is 1!
-The biblical Flood is not the post-glacial flooding of the earth several millennia ago recognised by all scientists, but another unique, catastrophic event several millennia ago that is not recognised by any scientist
-Ice ages never happened, because if they had, an ice age would prevent precipitation, which in turn would prevent them from ever ending (we would still be in an ice age)
-Evolution is a violation of the fundamental laws of nature, but not a global, catastrophic biblical flood
-Macroevolution is impossible, but after the Flood every species on the Ark hyperevolved into millions of species within millennia
-The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (modern paradigm of evolutionary science) completely discredits the theory of evolution and atheism
-A 40 day rainfall is such a sudden catastrophe that it causes animals to die at birth? But not a landslide, an earthquake, a volcanic eruption or anything else that actually occurs suddenly and that we know happens occasionally in reality
-The Great Flood created the Chicxulub crater (65 million years ago)
-God created the dinosaurs so that they could eat plants
-The biblical Jonah was swallowed by an ichthyosaur, which were not yet extinct 2-3k years ago
-All five great mass extinctions of Earth's past are really just the biblical flood. Modern palaeontologists simply cannot tell the difference
-Millions and billions of years are impossible and not true, but the Cambrian explosion proves God and design (the CE took place about 500 million years ago)
-All dating measurements are fundamentally wrong due to "assumptions". All scientists of the various disciplines are unable to measure the age of the universe. If they were able to do so, then God has gaslighted humanity and only made the universe appear to be very old
-Carbon dating is reliable when it confirms the age of the Shroud of Turin and the young age of dinosaur soft tissues, but not when it proves longer time periods and evolution.
-The Shroud of Turin is real, and this proves that the whole Bible is true
-The answer to a prayer about a sprained ankle confirms that the earth is young
-The Big Bang was not observed by anyone, so it can't be scientific (but God and biblical creation was???)
-God deliberately placed the countless asteroids and comets around our sun to teach us humility
-God placed asteroids and comets around our sun to "decorate" the solar system or out of anger during the Flood
-The asteroids and comets of our solar system, including the Kuiper Belt beyond Pluto, were formed in a cosmic impact just a few thousand years ago
-Protostellar discs do not exist anywhere in the universe
-Molecules in space cannot condense into clouds by themselves due to gravity
-Gravity alone can hold the stellar plasma together
-Astronomical simulations of the fusion processes of stars are worthless
-God has fine-tuned the universe for life, but the universe cannot spontaneously create life - the law of Biogenesis prevents it!
-The universe is fine-tuned, but not billions of years old (as fine-tuning suggests)
-God fine-tuned the universe for life, but even a simple molecule like water cannot spontaneously form in the universe
-God created a universe that cannot spontaneously produce life due to "planned obsolescence"; God intentionally created a broken universe because there is a heaven
-Scientific language contains conditionals (i.e. might/could have), therefore scientific data is false
-The summaries in scientific articles are "clickbait" (and not trustworthy)
-Science is imperfect (i.e. the peer review system is "broken"), so you can ignore the science you disagree with (evolution). However, science that deals with fine-tuning is always OK (because it proves design/creation)